Legal Opinion

Brelsford v. Scheltz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1978No. 17052PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Regina Brelsford and Kenyon Houchins, were denied partition of a tract of land, a portion of which defendant Allan Scheltz had conveyed to Mrs. Brelsford in payment for legal services. The court granted defendants’ motion for judgment when the plaintiffs rested their case. Plaintiffs argue that they were joint tenants and had the right to have partitioned their undivided interest in the property. We affirm.

Mary Ida Scheltz, mother of Allan and Michael Scheltz, conveyed the land in question to “Michael Scheltz, Trustee,” in 1972. No trust powers or terms were set out…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Unthank v. RippsteinTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hidalgo County v. PateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Costello v. Hillcrest State Bank of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Manchaca v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Ray v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nolana Development Ass'n v. CorsiTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Jordan v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Pickelner v. Adler, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Donohoe v. Hurbace (In Re Hurbace)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1986
  5. Houchins v. ScheltzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API