Legal Opinion

Pickelner v. Adler

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 28, 2007No. 01-03-01050-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

Appellants, Robert S. Pickelner and Ian Hurwitz, appeal separately from a final judgment rendered in a probate matter. We determine (1) whether the trial court erred by denying Pickelner’s motion for new trial for the mistaken reason that the motion had been belatedly filed; (2) whether Hurwitz preserved his complaint that the trial court erred by not rendering judgment in accordance with a partial settlement agreement and whether the court erred in denying his post-judgment motion asking to enforce that agreement; and (3) whether the trial court erred by implicitly…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hubbard v. ShankleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Longoria v. Lasater, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  3. Hampden Corp. v. Remark, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Gamboa v. GamboaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. In Re Estate of WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API