Pickelner v. Adler
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIM TAFT, Justice.
Appellants, Robert S. Pickelner and Ian Hurwitz, appeal separately from a final judgment rendered in a probate matter. We determine (1) whether the trial court erred by denying Pickelner’s motion for new trial for the mistaken reason that the motion had been belatedly filed; (2) whether Hurwitz preserved his complaint that the trial court erred by not rendering judgment in accordance with a partial settlement agreement and whether the court erred in denying his post-judgment motion asking to enforce that agreement; and (3) whether the trial court erred by implicitly…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Hubbard v. ShankleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Longoria v. Lasater, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Hampden Corp. v. Remark, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Gamboa v. GamboaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- In Re Estate of WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.