Legal Opinion

Manchaca v. Martinez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1941No. 7499PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

The sole question presented by this appeal is the right of the owners of the fee to compel a partition of the homestead during the rightful occupancy thereof by the surviving husband.

The land in question, consisting of 200 acres, was the separate property of Mary Martinez, and was occupied by her and her husband as their homestead during her lifetime. After her death her husband continued to occupy the property as his homestead. The grantees of some of the heirs of Mary Martinez brought suit against the husband and other heirs for partition of the property. It is their contention that,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ChesleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Hudgins v. SansomTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Tieman v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Brito v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Luckel v. Barnsdall Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Trevino v. Trevino, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  2. Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein Building CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Brelsford v. ScheltzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Savell v. SavellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Lane v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API