Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Perroni
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 19, 1989No. 89-166PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert C. Compton, Special Chief Justice.
Appellants are officials of the State of Arkansas. Appellees are businessmen and taxpayers of the State of Arkansas. This case was brought against appellants in their official capacities, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The trial court entered a Summary Judgment and Order holding that Act 43 of 1989 violates Article 5, Section 39, of the Arkansas Constitution because it failed to receive a vote of three-fourths of the members elected to each House of the General Assembly.
The Summary Judgment and Order also holds that all other subsequently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bush v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Davis v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Redding v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Smith v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arkansas Motor Carriers Ass'n. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Snyder v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
- First National Bank v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Fisher v. PerroniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.