Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
On this appeal we consider whether a remedy imposed by the National Labor Relations Board may successfully be challenged by an employer or whether it should be enforced, as requested by the Board in its cross-appeal. While the employer believes the remedy was imposed as a punitive measure, the Board relies on the broad discretion accorded it under the National Labor Relations Act (the Act) to shape remedies arising from unfair labor practices. The basic question to be answered in such litigation is whether the remedy effectuates the purposes of the Act. If it does, it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- George Kwatcher v. Massachusetts Service Employees Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991