Legal Opinion

Neth v. Delano

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court. — Eon. A. E. Waller, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

Appellant was employed, in operating a boring or mortising machine in the “mill room” where wood work was done in the car department of the shops of the Wabash railroad at •Moberly. In this room all sorts of timbers were cut, mortised, shaped and bored for use by carpenters who afterwards and elsewhere built or repaired cars. Appellant’s work was to mortise timbers for car sills and he had been engaged in such work for sixteen years. When a sill was finished according to specifications, appellant would remove the ’ sill from the mortising machine and place it on a trestle where it would…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davidson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. Hamilton v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Cobb v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Binz v. St. Louis Hide and Tallow CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Johnson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API