Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Ross

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 8, 1957No. 45773PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

A jury awarded Henry Hamilton $20,000 as damages for personal injuries sustained when he fell down stairsteps in a Kansas City apartment building owned and managed by appellants Ross and Rechner, respectively. Appellants, herein called defendants, have appealed from the ensuing judgment and contend that the trial court erred in ruling that respondent, herein called plaintiff, made a submissible case, in instructing the jury, and in permitting prejudicial jury argument. Defendants also contend that the verdict is grossly excessive. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal is…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rouchene v. Gamble Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Eickmann v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Lonnecker v. BorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. May v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Hanson v. TuckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tharp Ex Rel. Tharp v. MonseesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Whitt v. JarnaginIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Zipp v. Gasen's Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Hart v. City of ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Kelley v. HudsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API