Davidson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

This is the second appearance of this case here. The opinion which sets out the facts in the previous hearing will be found in 229 S. W. 786, to which opinion we refer, without going into detail. At the first trial the plaintiff had a verdict, but the trial court granted a rehearing. This order the Springfield Court of Appeals (207 S. W. 277) reversed, but certified the case to this court.after the filing of a motion for rehearing. The certification was upon the ground that their opinion conflicted with Neth v. Delano, 184 Mo. App. 652, from the Kansas City Court of Appeals.

The history of the…