Legal Opinion
Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Waid
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1928No. 2678PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is the seeond time that this case has 'been before us. On the former hearing we held that there was error in directing a verdict for defendant, and granted a new trial. 14 F.(2d) 90. On the new trial there was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant now complains because the court did not again direct a verdict in its favor. The evidence on the seeond trial was substantially the same as upon the first, except that there was addition al evidence as to the darkness prevailing at the time of plaintiff's injury. The facts were fully stated in the former…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Union Pacific Railroad v. HuxollSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Calloway v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Morris v. Sells-Floto Circus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Hasenjaeger v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Laughlin v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.