Laughlin v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in a crossing accident case in which verdict was directed for the defendant railway company. The evidence showed that an .automobile driven by plaintiff’s intestate was struck at an open public er°ssing near Helen, W. Va., by a train of cars which was being pushed ahead of an engine without ringing of bell, blowing of whistle, or other warning. There was evidence also tending to show that the intestate was signalled to cross by a brakeman stationed at the crossing. Defendant does not seriously contend that the evidence is not sufficient to establish…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. WalbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Cunningham Hardware Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Delaware, L. & W. R. v. WelshmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Erie R. Co. v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grammer v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Grammer v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934