Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Alvarado

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1998No. 24166Published

1Concurrence

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge,

ALSO SPECIALLY CONCURRING.

‘The time has come, the Legislature said, To give its own retort; Of p.s.i.’s and rider reviews, Of due process and the court.’3

While I agree in the result of the per curiam opinion, I write separately to give voice to the concern that Alvarado’s claim raises a legitimate issue regarding the court’s failure to hold a hearing before relinquishing jurisdiction. Prior to the 1995 legislative amendment noted herein, Idaho appellate courts long adhered to the proposition that a district court need not provide a defendant with a hearing before…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. DitmarsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lawny Lamar Browning v. Richard A. Vernon, Director Ron McKinseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Browning v. VernonDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1994
  5. Buffington v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API