Legal Opinion
Trinsey v. Mitchell
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-0976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAHN, Chief Judge.
This case involves the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s ballot access laws for senatorial and gubernatorial candidates of major political parties, as well as peripheral challenges to other aspects of the election scheme. Plaintiff Jack Trinsey (“Trinsey”), appearing pro se, 1 challenges the constitutionality of certain signature requirements of the Pennsylvania Election Code (“Election Code”). Additionally, Trinsey asks this court for an order rescheduling Pennsylvania’s primary election for a later date, and for a monetary judgment against the Republican…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Ex Rel. Hunt v. Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004