Legal Opinion

Trinco Investment Company v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 28, 2017No. 11-857 LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Takings; Necessity Defense for Fire-Fighting Actions On or Near National Forest; Reliability of Expert Opinion; Genuine Disputes of Material Fact Preclude Summary Judgment.

OPINION AND ORDER

BUSH, Senior Judge.

This takings case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The summary judgment motions have been fully briefed; oral argument was held, at plaintiffs’ request, on February 14, 2017. For the reasons stated below, the parties’ motions, which attempt to resolve the question of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bes design/build, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  2. In Re Downstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. Orr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API