Legal Opinion

Commercial Motor Freight, Inc. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 30, 1967No. Civ. No. 7939Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

This action was instituted by Commercial Motor Freight, Inc. (Commercial), *266Roadway Express, Inc. (Roadway), Hennis Freight Lines, Inc. (Hennis), Bell Lines, Inc. (Bell), The Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. (CCC), Motor Express, Inc. (Motor), and Liberty Highway Company (Liberty), to set aside and have enjoined the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission):

a) Granting Ohio Southern Express, Inc. (OSE) the authority to purchase the regular and irregular route operating rights of the bankrupt Vermilion Truck Line, Inc.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Crichton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API