Legal Opinion

Hillcrest Medical Center v. Monroy

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 2001No. 95,633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH RAPP, Judge:

T1 The trial court defendant, Nadine M. Monroy (Monroy), appeals a decision which refused to retroactively refund to her the wages garnished by the trial court plaintiff, Hillerest Medical Center (Hillerest).

BACKGROUND

T2 The essential facts are not disputed. Hillcrest holds a money judgment against Monroy which it obtained by default on May 16, 2000. On June 19, 2000, Hillerest issued a one-time garnishment of Monroy's wages. Monroy filed a claim for exemption but failed to appear for the hearing on the claim. Consequently, the court denied the claim.

13 Thereafter, Hillerest…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Davis v. GwaltneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ultra Thin, Inc. v. LaneCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. John Mashburn v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of OklahomaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API