Corr v. Continental Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This case is here on rehearing. (See Corr v. Continental Oil Co., 145 Kan. 78, 64 P. 2d 30.) In that opinion we held *2that the demurrer of defendants to the evidence of plaintiffs should have been sustained on the ground that plaintiffs had not established by substantial, competent evidence that drainage had occurred. A petition for a rehearing was filed in due time. It was argued vigorously that this court had laid down too strict a rule as to the proof required to establish á prima facie cause of action in cases of this type. Briefs were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Russell v. ConsidineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Corr v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Exchange State Bank v. JacobsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Williams v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940