Legal Opinion

Corr v. Continental Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1937No. 33,109PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for damages for draining the oil from under a lease on which plaintiffs owned the royalty interest. The case was tried and the issues of fact were submitted to a jury. The jury failed to agree and was discharged. Defendants appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the evidence of plaintiffs.

The action arose in the Valley Center oil field. The lease of which plaintiffs owned the royalty interest is known as the “Lambe 80.” The defendants owned the lease upon this tract as well as the adjoining tracts to the north and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grass v. Big Creek Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Kleppner v. LemonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Mitchell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Vilander v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API