Legal Opinion

Bancroft v. Randall

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1906No. Civ. No. 268Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order denying an injunction. Wm. S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

The action is to enjoin defendants from levying any special tax upon the taxable property within the Mount Diablo Union High School District, Contra Costa county, “for erecting any building for said district or for any purpose or purposes kindred thereto.”

A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment passed for defendants.

The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying an injunction.

It is alleged in the complaint: That plaintiff is the owner of real estate, as her separate property, situated in said Union High School District; that the board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pixley v. Lodi High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Barto v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Brown v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Martin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API