Legal Opinion

Barto v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1902No. S.F. No. 2565PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and judgment was entered for the defendants. This appeal is from the judgment, for the purpose of reviewing the order sustaining the demurrer.

It appears by the complaint that the plaintiff is a resident taxpayer in the city and county of San Francisco, and that the defendants, other than defendant Phelan, were at all times stated the duly qualified and acting members of the board of supervisors of said city and county; that defendant Phelan is, and was at all said times, the mayor of said city and county, and president of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McBride v. NewlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. County of Alameda v. EversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Granger v. Orange County Bd. SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Nunes v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API