Walsh v. Town of Millinocket
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] In this case, a jury has found, twice, that a Town Councilor exhibited discriminatory animus towards Mary Walsh because she had engaged in statutorily-protected conduct, and that this discriminatory animus was a cause or a motivating factor for the Millinocket Town Council’s decision to eliminate Mary Walsh’s position and thus terminate her employment with the Town. Walsh contends that discriminatory animus expressed by one member of the Town Council can be found to be a cause or a motivating factor for an adverse employment action approved by a vote of a Town Council. The Town contends…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hunter v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cine SK8, Inc. v. Town of HenriettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Theriault v. Genesis Healthcare LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Murray v. Kindred Nursing Centers West LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Fuhrmann v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Gerard Brady v. Cumberland CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Karen Cormier v. Genesis Healthcare LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.