Legal Opinion
Nielsen v. John G. Apisson, M.D., P. C.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert W. Doyle, J.
Subsequent to the filing of a note of issue in this case, counsel for defendant Dr. John G. Apisson served a subpoena upon one of the plaintiff’s treating physicians for testimony at trial. It is this defendant’s intention, as well as the intention of defendants Mendelsohn, Roth, Sauter and Greenwood, to privately interview plaintiff’s treating physicians in anticipation of presenting them for testimony at trial.
Plaintiff objects on the grounds such interviews are precluded under the holding in Anker v Brodnitz (98 Misc 2d 148, affd 73 AD2d 589, lv…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Prink v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Anker v. BrodnitzNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Anker v. BrodnitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Stoller v. Moo Young JunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Luce v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998