Legal Opinion
Stoller v. Moo Young Jun
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 1986PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Moo Young Jun and Eric I. Saltzman appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pino, J.), dated July 30, 1984, as denied their motion for a further examination before trial of nonparty witness Harvey Stoller, and for leave to interview a Dr. Hugh Biller.
Appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for a further examination before trial of nonparty witness Harvey Stoller dismissed. Insofar as it seeks review of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anker v. BrodnitzNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Anker v. BrodnitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by19 opinions
- Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Levande v. DinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Muller v. SorensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Arons v. JutkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hudson Valley Marine, Inc. v. Town of CortlandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.