Legal Opinion

Personette v. Cronkhite

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1895No. 17,144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

— Each of the appellees herein, except Phillip Gemmer, instituted an action in the Marion Surior Court against the appellant, Mary Personette and said Gemmer, to recover a judgment against the latter upon certain notes held by'each, and against both to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance by Gemmer to appellant to certain lots in the city of Indianapolis, known as the "North Side Addition.” The appellant filed an answer in denial in each action, and also a cross-complaint to quiet her title to the real estate in question. By agreement of parties there was a consolidation of all the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Cicero Township v. PickenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Whitlock v. VancleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Anderson v. EtterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Phyllis Jane Eyler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Gray v. BlankenbakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Boyd v. SchottIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Gipe v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Reagan v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API