Mennetti v. West Side Businessmen's Asso.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The faulty construction of the platform on which plaintiff was to perform his act is sufficiently established to sustain a finding that the platform was not safe. It is also evident that plaintiff’s fall was due to a condition which developed because of existing defects. To escape liability, the defendant first contends that the structure is not a “place of employment.” However, the use to which the platform was to be put and the relation of the men engaged there to the defendant’s operation, resulted in creation by defendant of a place in which work to be done was under the control of an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Neitzke v. Kraft-Phenix Dairies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Waldman v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Washburn v. SkoggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Waskow v. ReisingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Ruppa v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Luterbach v. Mochon, Schutte, Hackworthy, Juerisson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Meyer v. Val-Lo-Will Farms, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Hrabak v. Madison Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.