Meyer v. Val-Lo-Will Farms, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Plaintiffs base their plea for reversal on three propositions: (1) Mrs. Meyer was guilty of no more than assumption of risk, which is not a defense to a cause of action for violation of the safe-place statute; (2) the court should have submitted a question inquiring whether defendant was negligent with respect to maintenance of adequate lighting; (3) the court erred in submitting a question inquiring whether Mr. Meyer was negligent with respect to management of the toboggan on the last run.
1. Did Mrs. Meyer’s conduct constitute no more than assumption of risk? The jury found that Mrs. Meyer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Washburn v. SkoggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Baird v. CorneliusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Paluch v. Baldwin Plywood & Veneer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Puza v. C. Hennecke Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Cheetham v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- McCrossen v. Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.