Legal Opinion

Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. All Parties & Persons

California Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1960No. L. A. 23043; Sac. 6489PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

For convenience these two appeals will be disposed of in one opinion.

The facts in reference to the Ivanhoe case are as follows: On September 23, 1949, the district, acting under the Irrigation District Federal Cooperation Law (Wat. Code, §§23175 et seq.), entered into a contract with the United States, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior, for the delivery of a supply of water to the district for irrigation purposes from the Central Valley Project, and for the construction of a distribution system to make the water available on lands within the district.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bryant v. YellenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pearson v. State Social Welfare BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Albonico v. Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API