Legal Opinion

State of California v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 2000No. E025472PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

In this matter we are asked to determine whether or not the State of California (hereinafter State or petitioner) owns all of the groundwater present under the surface of the State. We conclude that it does, but that its “ownership” is not necessarily such as to trigger an “owned property” exclusion in a policy of liability insurance. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s ruling that the “owned property” exclusion applies, and remand for further proceedings on the question.

This action has its genesis in the State’s maintenance and/or operation of a toxic waste…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. City of Barstow v. Mojave Water AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Central & West Basin Water Replenishment District v. Southern California Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API