Tulsa Petroleum Corporation v. Westmoreland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, J. S. P.
Westmoreland, on December 19, 1933, instituted this action against the Tulsa Petroleum Corporation and the Limestone Oil & Gas Company to recover damages for their laying and maintaining a two-inch oil pipe line across the south end of his quarter section of land for a distance of 80 rods. The land lay north of and adjoining a section line highway running east and west. Approximately ten years prior to this action plaintiff sold a right of way to an electric company for a high line across this land parallel to the, ^highway, and, about a year later, removed his fence from the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pitzman v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Haas v. BrannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Schaidt v. BlaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Hallock v. SuitorOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conaway v. Time Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Caldwell v. ThiessenIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Boswell v. Shawnee Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Reed Logging Co. v. MarenakosWashington Supreme Court · 1948