Legal Opinion

Van Zandt v. Sweet

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1922No. Civ. No. 3569PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision with an automobile driven by defendant. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendant appeals.

At the time of the accident, August 28, 1919, plaintiff was in the service of an employer who had been insured by the state compensation insurance fund against liability for compensation to an employee. During plaintiff’s cross-examination the fact was brought out that he had made application to the Industrial Accident Commission for compensation under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hall v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Bassot v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Moseley v. Lily Ice Cream Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hartquist v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Reutenik v. Gibson Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Woods v. Hughes Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API