Legal Opinion

Hall v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1919No. Civ. No. 2705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the death of Lucius Endicott Hall, Jr., which is alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company. Plaintiffs are the surviving widow and minor child of said deceased. At the time of the accident which caused his death the deceased was employed by the defendant Southern Pacific Company as a pile inspector and construction engineer, and was performing services growing out of and incidental to such employment. After his death the plaintiffs filed a lawful claim against the defendant Southern…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M. Cerf v. Otis AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Bassot v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Daley v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Stackpole v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hunt v. Bank Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  4. Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Smith v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API