Legal Opinion

Rootberg v. American Express Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 22, 1972No. 72 Civ. 1626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant, American Express Company (Amexco), for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is granted.

The complaint alleges violation of the “Truth in Lending Act”, 15 U.S.C. Section 1601 et seq.; breach of contract; and fraud. Jurisdiction is based on 15 U.S.C. Section 1640 and pendant jurisdiction. The underlying facts giving rise to this action are apparently not in dispute. The plaintiff, Michael Root-berg, was the holder of an Amexco Money Card, a charge card, which he used to purchase…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garland v. Mobil Oil CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luis and Margaret Vega, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. Bright v. Ball Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API