Garland v. Mobil Oil Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
McLAREN, District Judge.
This matter arises on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. 1 Garland, a gasoline credit card customer of defendant Mobil Oil (“Mobil”) alleges that various actions by Mobil violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-65 (1970) (hereinafter “Act”) and that other actions by it violated the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Ill.Rev.Stat., ch. 121%, §§ 311-17 (1969) (hereinafter “Uniform Act”). 2 Garland sues on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated holders of Mobil credit cards for damages and…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Brooks v. Midas-International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Luis and Margaret Vega, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Hayna v. Arby's, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.