Legal Opinion
Bormuth v. Dahlem Conservancy
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 26, 2011No. Case No. 11CV-11354PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1), (6) [DOC. 7]
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion to dismiss. Defendant Dahlem Conservancy is a private, non-profit corporation operating an environmental education center on about 300 acres of land that is open to the general public. Plaintiff Peter Bormuth, who identifies himself as an animist and pagan, has visited the Dahlem Conservancy since 1975 until January 21, 2011, when he was asked not to return. Plaintiff asserts two claims against the Dahlem Conservancy and its director,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Peter Bormuth v. County of JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Fall v. La FitnessDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Amrit Kohli v. Affirmations Community CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Goemaere v. TiellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Hill v. State of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.