Legal Opinion
Fall v. La Fitness
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 11, 2016No. Case No. 1:15-cv-00127PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Susan J. Dlott, United States District Court Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 44). Plaintiff has filed a memorandum in opposition (Doc. 49), to which Defendants have replied (Doc. 51). Oral argument was held in Chambers on February 8, 2016. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion will be GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts1
On October 21, 2013, Plaintiff Mohamed Fall purchased a membership for the LA *603Fitness facility located at 4700 Marburg Avenue in the Oakley neighborhood of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leonard v. Bedrock Management Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Muhammad v. PNC Fin. Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Ora v. Fitness Internatl., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Saalim v. Walmart Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Souied v. Luma Energy Manageco, LLC., et.al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.