Legal Opinion

Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2011No. 08-0613PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice MEDINA, Justice GREEN, Justice JOHNSON, Justice WILLETT, Justice GUZMAN, and Justice LEHRMANN joined.

“The answer to most questions regarding arbitration ‘flow inexorably from the fact that arbitration is simply a matter of contract between the parties.’ ”1 Nevertheless, the United States Supreme Court has held in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., that the grounds for vacating or modifying an arbitration award under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)2 “are exclusive” and cannot be “supplemented by contract”.3 The…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Amedisys, Inc. D/B/A Amedisys Texas, Ltd. v. Kingwood Home Health Care, LLC D/B/A Health Solutions Home HealthTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. ReitzTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hoskins v. HoskinsTexas Supreme Court · 2016

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API