Bennett v. Stanley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 35.] BENNETT, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. STANLEY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Bennett v. Stanley,
2001-Ohio-128.] Torts—Negligence—Attractive nuisance—Unused residential swimming pool— Level of duty property owner owes to a child trespasser—Possessor of land subject to liability for physical harm to children trespassing thereon caused by an artificial condition upon the land, when—Adult who attempts to rescue a child from an attractive nuisance assumes the status of the child and is owed a duty of ordinary care by the property…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Di Gildo v. CaponiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State ex rel. Zollner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kell v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Weidman v. HildebrandtOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- Bilodeau v. Jordan, Unpublished Decision (3-28-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003