Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Stanley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. 2000-0108PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 35.] BENNETT, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. STANLEY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Bennett v. Stanley,

2001-Ohio-128.] Torts—Negligence—Attractive nuisance—Unused residential swimming pool— Level of duty property owner owes to a child trespasser—Possessor of land subject to liability for physical harm to children trespassing thereon caused by an artificial condition upon the land, when—Adult who attempts to rescue a child from an attractive nuisance assumes the status of the child and is owed a duty of ordinary care by the property…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Di Gildo v. CaponiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Zollner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kell v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Weidman v. HildebrandtOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Bilodeau v. Jordan, Unpublished Decision (3-28-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API