Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Peridot Tree, Inc. and Kenneth Gay, No. 2:22-cv-00289-KJM-SCR 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. City of Sacramento and Davina Smith, 1S Defendants. 16 17 The federal government’s policy on marijuana use and distribution was once clear and 18 | “comprehensive.” Gonzales v. Raich,
545 U.S. 1, 10
(2005). Today, however, as one Justice put 19 | ita few years ago, the federal policy has become “a half-in, half-out regime that simultaneously 20 | tolerates and forbids local use of maryuana.” Standing Akimbo, LLC v.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.