Edrington v. Hermann
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Harris County. Edrington and others, interveners in a suit by Austin against Hermann for the recovery of land, obtained writ of error on the affirmance on their appeal of a judgment by which the land was divided between plaintiff and defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
This action was brought by E. A. Austin, one of the defendants in error, against George H. Hermann, to recover a tract of 84 acres of land, a part of the John Austin league in Harris County. Hermann disclaimed as to part of the land sued for and asserted title to the remainder. The plaintiffs in error, J. M. Edrington, W. H. Edrington, M. E. Súber and C. B. G., Counts, intervened, claiming all of the land against both plaintiff and defendant. The judgment of the District Court was against the interveners and in favor of jplaintiff for part of the land and in "favor…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Smith v. CrosbyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Pierson v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
- Wilkinson v. RoperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Pry v. PryIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Kellner v. RamdohrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Continental Supply Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. KaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- White v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.