Legal Opinion

St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Kaylor

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1927No. 744—4683PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

This ease is fully stated by the Court of Civil Appeals. See 2S4 S. W. 983. The nature of the case is summarized by that court as follows:

“Joe F. Kaylor, appellee in the above numbered and styled cause, was awarded a judgment in the district court of Grayson county for $12,325 against appellant, St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Company, as damages for personal injuries received while in the service of appellant. The said judgment was awarded on the findings of a jury on special issues, and is in response to said findings. Appellant has duly perfected its appeal to this court.” ,

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Austin & Northwestern Railroad v. CluckTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. WilsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Southern Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Edrington v. HermannTexas Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. James A. Dick Co. v. YanezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Standard Paving Co. v. PyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. StarlingTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Southern Underwriters v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API