Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Flanagan

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 29, 1972No. L-1795PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*6MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THEIS, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, Charles G. Hamilton filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking his release from custody of the United States Army. At the time his petition was filed he was stationed at Ft. Riley, Kansas, serving as a Private E-2 in Medical Company, MEDDAC, in a noncombatant status. Petitioner has since (on December 13, 1971) been released from active duty and is assigned to the United States Army Control Group (Annual Training) RCPAC, St. Louis, Missouri, an Army Reserve assignment. He has a six year Army Reserve obligation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Home Care Association of America v. Gavin NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API