Legal Opinion

Wingfield Motor Co. v. Dupont

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1931No. 1 Div. 930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

So far as this ease is concerned, the facts may be stated as follows: Plaintiff was the owner of an Essex automobile, the estimated value of which was from $125 to $300. With his consent his wife took the car and with her children started to Pascagoula. Before getting to Mobile plaintiff’s wife with her baby got out of the car and into a closed car, leaving the Essex with her son and Peter Dobbs, an employee of defendant. Before the Essex got to Mobile it broke down, of which fact plaintiff’s wife was notified, and she, with the consent of plaintiff, arranged with defendant to have the car…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Mobile Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Conner & Johnson v. Allen & ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Pinckard v. CasselsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Cook v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Behr v. GersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Warren v. PeppersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Walls v. BordersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API