Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. League of Nebraska Municipalities

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1951No. 32927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Appellee filed an application with the Nebraska State Railway Commission, hereinafter called the commission, for authority to substitute daily passenger trains 41 and 42 for daily passenger trains 15 and 16 between Table Rock and Wymore and daily except Sunday passenger motor trains 23, 24, 89, and 90 between Lincoln and Wymore, by operating trains 41 and 42 between Lincoln and Table Rock via Wymore instead of via Tecumseh. In other words, the authority sought by the appellee was to discontinue trains 15 and 16 between Wymore and Table Rock and discontinue motor trains 23, 24, 89, and 90…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Municipalities of HoldregeNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Airline Ground Service, Inc. v. Checker Cab Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bee Line Motor Freight v. Petersen & Petersen, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Barth v. Lincoln Telephone & Telegraph Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of Ruan Transport Corp. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Chicago & North Western Railway Co v. City of NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bostick v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Nebraska Public Power District v. HuebnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Nebraska State Railway Commission v. Service Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API