Legal Opinion
O'SULLIVAN v. Joy Technologies, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 6, 1995No. 0754PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. We are asked to determine whether under the law of New York, the lower court erred in enforcing a registration agreement between appellant, Joy Technologies Inc. (“Joy”) and appellee, Eugene J. O’Sullivan (“O’Sullivan”) and awarding damages with prejudgment interest to O’Sullivan. Upon review, we affirm.
The record reveals that Joy was a manufacturer of coal mining and environmental equipment. O’Sullivan was Chief Financial Officer of Joy and a holder of its stock. In 1987, the parties…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Action S.A. And Deltamar Establishment v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc. And Marc Rich, Marc RichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Walker v. Grand Central Sanitation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Rodolitz v. Neptune Paper Prods.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. NatarelliNew York Supreme Court · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Updyke v. BP Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- A.I. Credit Corp. v. GohresDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- BRAND DESIGN COMPANY, INC. v. RITE AID CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Rezro, Inc. v. Lanfranco, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Santana v. Lucas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2005