Legal Opinion
Duperry v. Solnit
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 13, 2002No. SC 16618PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The principal issues in this appeal are whether the habeas court: (1) improperly established a new constitutional rule in a collateral proceeding in contravention of the principle announced in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S. Ct. 1060, 103 L. Ed. 2d 334 (1989), by concluding that a criminal defendant who pleads not guilty with the affirmative defense of mental disease or defect1 must be canvassed as though he is pleading guilty to ensure that his plea is made knowingly and voluntarily; and (2) improperly concluded that the petitioner in the present case was not…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.