Legal Opinion

Windom v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 6, 2004No. SC01-2706, SC02-2142PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

886 So.2d 915 (2004)

Curtis WINDOM, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Curtis Windom, Petitioner,

v.

James V. Crosby, Jr., etc., Respondent.

Nos. SC01-2706, SC02-2142.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 6, 2004.

Rehearing Denied as July 8, 2004.

Jeffrey M. Hazen of Brody & Hazen, P.A., Registry Counsel, Tallahassee, FL, for Appellant/Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Scott A. Browne, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Appellee/Respondent.

Rehearing Denied as to SC01-2706 July 8, 2004.

2Per curiam

Curtis Windom appeals an order of the circuit court denying a motion for post-conviction…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Wells; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited169 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by52 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. State v. SteeleSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Toney Deron Davis v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API