Legal Opinion
Key v. Liquid Energy Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1990No. 88-2643PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P., 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma denying the Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial, filed by Liquid Energy Corporation and Mitchell Energy and Development, collectively referred to as “the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Charlette A. Karns, Individually, and as Mother and Next Friend of Donald Wayne Pearce v. Emerson Electric Co., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Kiowa Indian Tribe v. HooverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Mrs. Verdie Mae Franklin Verdie Mae Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lonnie B. Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Steven L. Wilson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.