United States v. Horvath
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge BEA; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI.
ORDER
Judges Pregerson and Graber voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Rymer voted to grant it.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court called for a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The majority of the nonrecused active judges failed to vote in favor of en banc rehearing.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. With this order the Clerk shall also file Judge Graber’s concurrence, Judge Bea’s dissent from denial, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Bea; Dissent · Kozinski.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Billy Maurice Ogden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. PettyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Sergio Rafael GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Brent VreelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jonathan OliverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Abel Montoya-GaxiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.