D'Alesandro v. Clare
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
In this personal injury action, the plaintiff, Diane L. D’AIesandro, appeals following the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the defendant David E. Clare, Jr.1 *179On appeal, the plaintiff claims that she is entitled to a new trial because (1) the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, (2) the verdict was the result of the jury’s misapplication of the law and (3) in its charge to the jury, the court improperly referred to the testifying police officer as an expert. The defendant asserts that the general verdict rule applies,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Macy v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Mazuroski v. HernovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Rivezzi v. MarcucioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Turturino v. HurleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Morales v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Segale v. O'CONNORConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Diener v. TiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.