Ward v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Chief Judge.
The question on this appeal is whether the Petroleum Products Franchises Act, A.R.S. § 44-1551, et seq., can be applied to a franchise agreement in existence on the date the act took effect. The trial court found that it could not and entered summary judgment for defendants. We affirm.
Plaintiff and defendant Standard Oil Company of California, Western Operations, Inc., entered into a “dealer lease” and “three-party dealer supply contract” dated August 7, 1972, covering plaintiffs operation of a Chevron service station at Willcox. Both agreements were for a term…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kresos v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Foltz v. NoonArizona Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- McAleer Buick-Pontiac Co. v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- McDonald's Corp. v. NelsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
- Davis v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Earthworks Contracting, Ltd. v. Mendel-Allison Construction of California, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.