Foltz v. Noon
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Santa Cruz. W. A. O’Connor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
Appellant, as the assignee of numerous laborers who worked upon appellee’s mining claims, instituted this action for the purpose of fastening a miner’s lien upon said mining claims. The important allegations of the complaint are: that appellee is the owner of mining claims; that on March 6, 1912, he entered into a bond, option or contract of sale of mining claims to W. R. Layne, who thereafter, on March 18, 1912, assigned the agreement of sale to the Border Mines Company, and by the terms of said agreement the Border Mines Company “was permitted to go upon said mining claims and to work and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- National Surety Co. v. Architectural Decorating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Jones v. Great Southern Fireproof Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Andrews & Johnson Co. v. AtwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Globe Hardware Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa De Siena, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Brotherhood of American Yeomen v. ManzArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Ward v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Mulcahy Lumber Co. v. OhlandArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. LarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.